The relativity of travel cuisine
06.09.2011
OK. So you go to an 'exotic' place on your travels. The food is a huge drawcard. Amazing flavours are bound to be everywhere, in every dish. But is this the reality?
During the first few days of wanting to experiment with 'everything', you do several things.
One: eat where the guidebook says, which can be a problem if the review is old, the place has become super popular (and therefore average), or if its just not your style. Timing is everything if you follow the guidebook. Too long after the review and its become a sea of tourists all too afraid to admit the food might be boring or bad (but more about tourist denial later).
Two: you follow the locals (or ask a local) in an effort to find the cheap and authentic food heart of the place. You steer clear of tourists and order by pointing at a picture or mimicking the movements of the animal (not recommended unless you can withstand group humiliation in a foreign language). But eating 'local' can disappoint because as is true of many places, day to day cuisine is based on the commonest, easiest ingredients, often not that exotic. So noodle soup flavoured with pepper is the local 'food', but there's nothing that exotic about flavoured water if you were after a taste sensation never before had.
Three: eat where you see the most people eating (and where locals outweigh tourists). This can be a great guide as it means you often get great quality, but what if you don't know what to order? You can end up with steak and chips like I did in Paris, when I thought I ordered something French-sounding with loads of butter and 'Frenchness'.
My point: It's really easy to go to a great place with great food and order the most mundane thing on the menu.
So maybe this is already somebody's life's work, but there definitely needs to be a plain language food guide to the world. One that dispels some of the exotocism from what can often turn out to be a fairly mundane reality of travel eating. And does some realistic 'interpreting' of common ingredients and regional cuisine. I mean, bread is still bread in bagel, baguette, flatstone, pizza base, roti, naan or worthless whitebread slice form. An like menu's the word over: Beef or chicken (or in some places pigeon and frog) still form the basis of most dishes.
This might seem like a cynical take from only a two-country jaunt and only 25 or so meals, but it's not. One dollar noodle soup prepared and eaten in a marketplace brimming with hardworking hill tribe women is a special experience, even if pepper is the only flavour. Average spring rolls eaten with a 180 degree view of Hanoi's nightscape across the colourfully lit Hoan Kiem lake is not to be scoffed at. And steamed spiced fish prepared by your own hands to a Lao recipe, and eaten in a riverside garden is unforgettable.
So all I'm saying is food is part flavour and part atmosphere. It's just that the proportions can change, depending where you are and what you order.
Posted by blueraincoat 20:37 Archived in Laos Comments (0)

